Call It Mitchellism or Cansecoism – Seems Like McCarthyism

Posted on 12 14, 2007 under Current Events by foodad | Comments

I’m no Clemens apologist, but it seems like each of the players on the list have already been convicted in the court of public opinion. It harkens back to the days of McCarthyism where, as soon as Joe McCarthy spoke your name, you were labeled a pinko commie bastard.  How could Burgess Meredith be a communist?

Some of the evidence seems a little sketchy as do some of the omissions. How was it decided that an incomplete report would be published? How was it decided that players who obviously used something to enhance their game, like Sammy Sosa.

Canseco has said that Mitchell’s report is a farce and that certain players were left out.  What I want to know is, how did they decide where to draw the stick in the sand? How did Clemens get Mitch slapped when players Sosa were left alone?

 

Trackbacks

(Trackback URL)

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus